標題: [球例] 球例討論 [打印本頁]

---

作者: kkk555    時間: 2012-10-27 16:10     標題: 球例討論

[youtube]tRMLUtA2lxc[/youtube]

其實馬龍係條片有冇發球違規
個裁判係唔係捉丁寜果個

[attach]17128[/attach]

---

作者: monkey330    時間: 2012-10-27 16:23

我覺得有違的

---

作者: zeio    時間: 2012-10-27 16:44

唔係新鮮事,馬龍响09年世錦賽同亞錦賽都被判咗幾個,問題都係球離手後唔夠16厘米.睇翻馬龍06年出道係冇個波跟住隻手上升嗰段,08年改咗後就不時被判,睇來喺裁判個角度睇隻手跟住去好容易造成唔夠高嘅印象,另外呢個發球動作不時出現掂到鼻、波衫嘅情況, no good.

2.06.02          The server shall then project the ball near vertically upwards, without imparting spin, so that it rises at least 16cm after leaving the palm of the free hand and then falls without touching anything before being struck.

p.s. 睇翻片段馬龍07年開始已經有手跟波嘅習慣,但係球離手比而家明顯

[ 本帖最後由 zeio 於 2012-10-27 17:00 編輯 ]

---

作者: 葉師傅    時間: 2012-10-27 16:45

絕對有問題啦 ! 只係個裁判捉同唔捉既問題姐 !

---

作者: zeio    時間: 2012-10-27 17:09

王皓個鏟式發球好多人都話違規,但係冇點見判過,馬琳高低拋有轉冇轉都係,兩個人嘅共通點都係手拋波後冇咩跟隨向上嘅動作,但係會停留响身前臨到擊球前一剎那向橫移開,在擾亂對方判斷下又唔影響裁判視角,理論上附合球例 2.06.05,完全走精面

2.06.05          As soon as the ball has been projected, the server’s free arm and hand shall be removed from the space between the ball and the net.
The space between the ball and the net is defined by the ball, the net and its indefinite upward extension.

---

歡迎光臨 香港乒乓網 (http://hkttf.com./)

Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0